About Us
Trusted Experts Revolutionizing the UIF Industry
The Dynamix Vision
Follow the process and hold on to your vision. Our team of Dynamix UIF Specialists is here to assist you in achieving peace of mind by maximizing your UIF opportunities.
we will either find a way or create a way,
but we won't create excuses
Get to Know Us
The Dynamix UIF Specialists
Our Labour Consultancy, situated in Gauteng's Boksburg area, is a hub of positivity and energy.
Our services revolve around managing unemployment benefits, employer compliance, registrations, declarations, and human resources support.
Our team of enthusiastic Dynamix UIF Specialists is not only professional but also amicable.
We pride ourselves on our customized approach to serving you, which is unmatched.
Our primary objective is to provide you with the best possible outcomes for your UIF claim and ensure that company's UIF Declarations are rectified and compliant.
The Dynamix UIF Solutions
At Dynamix UIF Specialists, we take pride in being a pioneering consultancy and administration firm that comprises a dynamic team of creative thinkers.
Our primary goal is to help our clients save time, eliminate dissatisfaction, and avoid frustration. With our extensive knowledge and proficiency, we provide tailored solutions that cater to the unique requirements of our clients.
Our top-notch Dynamix UIF Specialist Team ensures that you receive personalized attention, and our highly trained specialists strive to fulfill your needs with speed, honesty, and excellence.
ABOUT US
Meet the Team
Extraordinary people achieving remarkable accomplishments.
Julandie Scholtz (Swart)CEO and HR Business Partner
As the founder and CEO, Julandie has established herself as a prominent figure in the labour industry. In addition to founding several Facebook community groups such as Labour Law Help and Advice for Employees South Africa, UIF Questions and Answers South Africa, and UIF Help and Advice South Africa, she boasts years of experience as a UIF specialist. Her expertise is widely recognized and respected.
Shaun SwartChief Operations Officer
Managing Director and Electrician at H.A. Electrical Tech (pty) ltd
As one of the executive decision-makers, Shaun, who is an Electrician by Trade and Co-Founder, plays a vital role in the organization. He is highly respected for his proficiency in conflict resolution and mediation. Furthermore, he co-founded Labour Law Help and Advice for Employees South Africa. Shaun is also renowned for his outstanding abilities as an Artisan Electrician.
What our clients have to say about us
The Dynamix Magix, when we make our clients smile
Working with Employers to be compliant
I would like to express my gratitude to Julandie and her team for ensuring that our company's declarations were fixed and compliant. Their professionalism and valuable advice is greatly appreciated. I highly recommend Julandie and the Labour Dynamix Team.
Going the extra mile
For close to 6 months, we had battled to get my husband's UIF claim approved. I contacted Julandie from Labour Dynamix as I was at my wits ends 😵💫... I didn't know which way to turn, as I had been contacting the call centre every day for 5 months, just to get the same excuse day after day. I had written a complaint to the complaint email address and never received a response then Julandie was sent on our path by referral of a few people
The Dynamix Team does it again
“Wow, what an awesome company to deal with. I had huge UIF problems and looked into this company but decided no I can master filing. How wrong I was. I contacted this company, paid a very small fee for what they do. Julandie went out of her way to help me some mornings at 4am she was sending mails. She gives her all to submit and finalize the claim.
Off The Topic
This section is designed to encourage clients to engage with us in a constructive manner. This area goes beyond the typical product or service descriptions and instead focuses on fostering meaningful discussions and exchanges.
The goal of this section is to create a space where clients feel empowered to think critically, ask thoughtful questions, and engage in open-ended conversations
"Justice is best served when all parties approach conflict with open but cautious minds. Wild accusations breed wilder reactions, while calm facts tend towards calm solutions. Social media empowers public voice, but true empowerment comes from private understanding. Let us lift each other with dignity, and resolve disputes as fellow travelers seeking the same light - not as opponents in battles of will." -
While consumers have a right to share experiences, and businesses a duty to address concerns, the path is clearer when all remember our shared humanity. Speculation and outrage stir storms, but compassion finds sunlight.
While social platforms can empower consumers, it's crucial feedback is constructive rather than destructive. Making factually inaccurate or emotionally motivated claims risks damaging credibility and progress.
Businesses, consumers and society all benefit when resolution prioritizes open dialogue over public spectacle. A wiser approach is using official complaint procedures, which allow cool heads to properly assess situations from multiple angles.
Reputable organizations also want to improve customer satisfaction - private discussion gives chance to clarify misunderstandings versus accusations alone. If unresolved, third party mediation could evaluate facts objectively.
But starting publicly risks escalation where none intended, and may deny solutions a fair hearing. We all must think how our words may affect others, and if anger serves real justice.
While social media empowers, we must exercise that power responsibly. Perhaps with more compassionate listening on all sides, fewer feel need to "go public" in the first place.
There are usually better paths than spectacle for resolving disputes in a way all can grow from. It's important for consumers to consider the potential consequences of their actions on social media.
Credibility impact: Making factually inaccurate claims undermines one's credibility. This hurts the consumer's reputation and influence on future reviews or discussions. Escalation risk: Emotionally charged public posts often escalate tensions rather than resolve issues. This hinders productive dialogue and cooperative solutions. Legal liability: False statements posted with intent to harm a business could constitute defamation
While consumers have a right to share experiences, and businesses a duty to address concerns, the path is clearer when all remember our shared humanity. Speculation and outrage stir storms, but compassion finds sunlight.
While social platforms can empower consumers, it's crucial feedback is constructive rather than destructive. Making factually inaccurate or emotionally motivated claims risks damaging credibility and progress.
Businesses, consumers and society all benefit when resolution prioritizes open dialogue over public spectacle. A wiser approach is using official complaint procedures, which allow cool heads to properly assess situations from multiple angles.
Reputable organizations also want to improve customer satisfaction - private discussion gives chance to clarify misunderstandings versus accusations alone. If unresolved, third party mediation could evaluate facts objectively.
But starting publicly risks escalation where none intended, and may deny solutions a fair hearing. We all must think how our words may affect others, and if anger serves real justice.
While social media empowers, we must exercise that power responsibly. Perhaps with more compassionate listening on all sides, fewer feel need to "go public" in the first place.
There are usually better paths than spectacle for resolving disputes in a way all can grow from. It's important for consumers to consider the potential consequences of their actions on social media.
Credibility impact: Making factually inaccurate claims undermines one's credibility. This hurts the consumer's reputation and influence on future reviews or discussions. Escalation risk: Emotionally charged public posts often escalate tensions rather than resolve issues. This hinders productive dialogue and cooperative solutions. Legal liability: False statements posted with intent to harm a business could constitute defamation
By stepping "off the topic" of our specific services, we aim to build deeper, more authentic relationships with our clients
This hinders productive dialogue and cooperative solutions. Legal liability: False statements posted with intent to harm a business could constitute defamation
Consumers must be careful about legal boundaries. Hindering progress: Public outrage may attract attention initially but closes minds to nuanced discussion. It denies businesses natural justice to properly respond before judgement. Sets poor example:
Others may emulate unconstructive behaviour, worsening discourse standards on review platforms relied on by all. We must consider the social impact of our online actions.
Alternative options: Most industries have formal complaint procedures and mediation/arbitration. These give a fair hearing to grievances and often satisfy all parties privately.
Whilst speculation about motives/intentions: Publicly questioning whether a business "deliberately" caused harm without clear evidence poisons the well for cooperation. Outrage over perceived slights: Blowing minor problems out of proportion galvanizes oppositional stances versus understanding.
Resolution needs scale and nuance. Unverified accusations: Wild claims spread rapidly online but resolving disputes requires establishing facts, not fuelling rumor. Due process matters. Personal attacks: Questioning character erodes goodwill for compromise.
Conflicts are best addressed through civil analysis of behaviours, not ad hominess tactics. Echo chambers: Social media outrage often preaches to the converted, versus bringing opposing perspectives together. Isolation versus mediation breeds further conflict.
Lost focus: Noisy public disputes distract from substantive issues. Resolution work is careful listening and common-ground seeking, not preformative displays. In all, reasoned discussion that establishes an evidentiary, balanced baseline from which common solutions can be built serves justice and social well-being far better than cries of foul play.
In summary, while transparency has value, consumers would be wise to exhaust official, evidence-based options before turning to emotionally charged public appeals. Cool heads and balanced perspectives usually serve justice and progress far better.